Write a Review

Damsels in Distress movie reviews

• 7

  Damsels in Distress

  Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:43:38 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  cute movie!

• 10

  Damsels in Distress

  Friday, May 11, 2012 7:07:38 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  loved it!!!!!!!!!

• 10

  Damsels in Distress

  Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:07:24 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  unique and different - loved it!!!!..not for everyone, but for some, a treasure

• 1

  Damsels in Distress

  Saturday, May 5, 2012 6:22:49 PM | (age group: 50 or over.) | M

  I believe this is one of the worst movies I have seen in years.Boring,bad direction,bad everything. Dont go if your tired !

• 9

  Damsels in Distress

  Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:44:21 AM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  I hate to say this, but having just seen the TIFF spceial presentation of Damsels, I have a hard time seeing anyone lining up to back another Stillman picture. I love his movies, and was quite taken with the new one, but if anything it’s less accessible to a broad audience (it’s certainly “weirder”). Here’s hoping I’m wrong.

• 8

  Damsels in Distress

  Wednesday, May 2, 2012 10:36:59 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  witty and entertaining...loved all the performances. a gem of a movie.

• 7

  Damsels in Distress

  Friday, April 27, 2012 11:18:44 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  smart and funny. laughed out loud many times during the film. brody is surprisingly good.

• 9

  Damsels in Distress

  Friday, April 20, 2012 10:23:17 AM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  I Hope this film is like Last Days of Disco. I also hope it's like Barcelona and Metropolitan. The last thing Whit Stillman should do is look to Judd Apatow for ratpiinsion (talented though Judd is)

• 5

  Damsels in Distress

  Monday, March 19, 2012 1:31:53 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I hate to say this, but having just seen the TIFF saceipl presentation of Damsels, I have a hard time seeing anyone lining up to back another Stillman picture. I love his movies, and was quite taken with the new one, but if anything it’s less accessible to a broad audience (it’s certainly “weirder”). Here’s hoping I’m wrong.